- To publish an open response to the open letter
Consistently collect equality data without exception
To share disaggregated data pertaining to research funding. (shared in the funding diversity data report published Dec 2020)
To make transparent and public the panellists and selection criteria involved in forthcoming research call assessment
To review the funding assessment process and conflict of interest policy
To support a symposium where marginalised academics can explore issues of concern and have their voices heard. The symposium will be co-designed and facilitated by those who have lived experience of the issue discussed
To inform Dr Adelaine & colleagues how they can engage in the consultation on the policy paper ‘Reducing bureaucratic burden in research, innovation and higher education’ and other strategic policy discussions
To share what ‘Equality Impact Assessments’ have been undertaken under the ‘Public Sector Equality Duty’ and how to locate them
To work with Dr Adelaine and the Freedom of Information Team to ascertain what information is forthcoming and what data can be requested. It is noted that Dr Adelaine is still requesting disaggregated data on UKRI staff; this is beyond the remit of the funding diversity data report
To connect Dr Adelaine & colleagues with those working on internal EDI / staff inclusion so they can be made aware of how Black academics/ experts in race & inclusion might engage and support this process
UKRI will facilitate contact with NIHR so the details of the specific fund can be discussed in greater depth
- UKRI and the UKRI CEO, Professor Ottoline Leyser, have committed to collecting equality data on all research funding applications.
- Awards such as the UKRI/ESRC research fund to explore factors affecting ethnic minority groups during COVID-19, have publicly stated their selection process, selection panel and consideration of conflict of interest
- In Dec 2020, UKRI published their disaggregated funding data which highlighted that in the 2018-2018 year, just 10 Black individuals were principal investigators of UKRI research; Black academics were significantly less likely to be successful in their applications and across the 9 research councils 4 or less Black individuals were awarded fellowships. Whilst transparency is welcomed it further highlights the severity of the challenges presented.
- Dr Adelaine and colleagues have continued to communicate with UKRI about the actions highlighted
- UKRI has not yet responded to the open letter signed by nearly 3,000 individuals.
- Whilst disaggregated funding data was released, UKRI has not yet released funding data regarding its own staff members
- The disaggregated data on ethnicity does not explore the intersection of race and gender. It is not possible to assess the discrimination encountered by Black women
- Whilst there is greater transparency in information about funding awards and processes, this data has not disaggregated ethnicity (making it impossible to distinguish the experience of Black individuals), and the role of Principal Investigators and Co-Investigators has been combined, making it impossible to determine who is leading the research process
- Dr Adelaine and colleagues have not yet been given information regarding how they might engage with the review of the funding assessment process or conflict of interest policy
- Dr Adelaine and colleagues have not yet been given information regarding the symposium for marginalised academics
- Dr Adelaine and colleagues have not yet been given information regarding how they might engage in policy or strategy discussions, such as the policy paper 'Reducing bureaucratic burden in research, innovation and higher education’ and other strategic policy discussions
- Dr Adelaine and colleagues have not yet been given information regarding how they might view or access the relevant Equality Impact Assessments
- Dr Adelaine and colleagues have not yet been connected to UKRI staff members who are working on the internal EDI strategy for staff members
- Dr Adelaine and colleagues have not yet been connected to NIHR staff members, so they can discuss the details of the specific fund can be discussed in greater depth
[Admendment: In an earlier version of this blog, I highlighted that the Government steering group on Research and Development (R&D) People and Culture Strategy which had no Black members, I have subsequently been notified that the membership has changed and there is now at least one Black individual involved - This is great news!].
Fri, 19 Mar 2021 18:30
Whilst we appreciate that UKRI is a large and complex organisation that is impacted by a range of actors and external factors, we are concerned that the pace of action is too slow.
At this critical time, where our society is being impacted on an unprecedented scale and when the research sector is being re-landscaped to meet current needs, we believe that decisions must be made in a transparent, inclusive and accountable way.
Black academics/researchers (alongside other under-represented groups of academics/researchers) must be involved so that research equity is ensured.
We would also like to thank individuals at UKRI who have continued to work with us and to support change.
Whilst this work is housed on it's own website, the work is primarily undertaken by Dr Addy Adelaine and the non-profit organisation Ladders4Action. Please subscribe to the Ladders4Action Mailing List if you would like to stay updated on news and events
The work on knowledge equity undertaken by Dr Addy Adelaine and the non-profit organisation Ladders4Action has not been sponsored, we do not receive funding for this work, because of this, we depend on donations to pay for the advocacy and pro-bono work we undertake on this topic. If you would like to donate, it would help us to continue our work and it would be greatly appreciated.